Eye Tap, Vision Terminator Style

by mindhacker on June 1, 2009

Ever wondered how come a T800 is able to view the world through his human eyes and his supercomputer brain at the same time?

terminator

Well it seems like technology is catching up fast to this desire of nerds so to say. A couple of years ago a device was prototyped which fooled the retina into ‘seeing‘ computer generated images through a wearable eye patch and some bulky hardware box. But recently a new device called eye tap has been pretty much perfected and tested. The eye normally functions as a camera only and not like a display device. What eye tap does is merge computer generated imagery along with real imagery to give the user a virtual terminator like visual experience of the real world. Imagine when looking at something all relevant data being displayed right next to it (yes T800 i am your boss). Eye tap does this by splitting the light reaching the retina, using mirrors, processing it to generate the modified the image and then diverting it back to retina. The diverted image could be the same as the original image or it could be modified, so that you get a virtual image superimposed on reality. For more details and information on how the device works go here.

eyetap

Image Source= Wikipedia (Creative Commons Licensed)

Related Posts

  1. Touchable Holographic Display
  2. XP Running on Windows 7
  • mindhacker
    @ supersparky. Yes you are right and that is perhaps the fundamental limit of all human computer interaction devices (HCI) at the moment and the reason why this and other similar technologies aren't becoming commercial. But it is still better than previously having to take a processing box with you. Similar technologies will only become popular if they give a natural feel with functionality.
  • How does greatly limiting the peripheral vision of one eye, and the ability to turn your eye left or right to see anything, "improve" vision? Such devices are only helpful in a limited setting.

    A method of adding to vision and not enhancing limited vision would seem to be the better approach. Human eyes scan their environment. The head only moves to center an object of observation. Turning your head like a movie camera would make you dizzy, and would be very unnatural.

    Peripheral vision and the ability to move the eye must be paramount. Otherwise there's no useful purpose in it in a practical sense.
  • Matt
    So unfair, I'm blind in one eye xD
  • mac
    I can see this being really useful to the military. Imagine a sniper that can aim better, heck a tripod mounted weapon that the shooter can change his aim a fraction at a time and not be worried about his movement pulling the shot high or low.
  • Wow !!
    Good work .
    But don't you think it will affect the eye ???
    But its really cool gadget
  • Cool!! Amazing!!
  • mindhacker
    @ Brian you're right the eye tap really does stand out in comparison to competing ideas or technologies and it is in a sort of limbo, but that can happen to the best of designs. Yes the problems you have pointed out are there.
  • From all I can see, the eyetap device itself is in a sort of limbo. No one is building any; the original inventor Steve Mann is hoping to license the technology to a manufacturer.

    No new research is being done using this approach. The developers have switched to using their cellphones as a ubiquitous "glogging" device. See http://www.glogger.mobi

    I really want an eyetap too; it has many advantages over competing designs. The main one is that you can REPLACE real-world images with computer generated ones, not just OVERLAY them.

    Today's technology still suffers in two arenas:
    Processing speed - there is a visible lag between the camera and the display. It is more serious the more processing that you do to the image.
    Field of view - typically the FOV is less than 20 degrees. The best system would cover the full field of regard of the eye, at maximum visual acuity. This unfortunately requires bulky relay optics and display resolution that is just not there yet.

    But I keep hoping....

    -Brian
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: