Ford Nucleon – The Nuclear Powered Car

by yasir on May 3, 2009

 

ford-nucleon_2

I was doing some research on different renewable energy sources for an electric car as I was considering this project for my final year, when I came across the energy source I could have never thought to be used in a car, the  “Atomic Car” . Of course we have nuclear weapons, submarines, ships, power plants, but who has heard about nuclear cars? Like Project Pluto and Tu-119 Nuclear powered aircrafts, it was a project destined to be doomed.

The concept of Nuclear car dates back to 1957-58 when Ford Motor Company unveiled its project of an atomic car named as Ford Nucleon. Once fuelled with enriched uranium this car didn’t require refueling for years. It will require only uranium and water to power it on the same mechanism as that of a nuclear power plant. It would have been one of the most environment friendly cars , until the hazards of radioactivity interfered and put this Ford Nucleon project to a stand still, never to be realised again.

1958_ford_nucleon

One of the major concerns of this project was the shielding of the nuclear reactor with lead , which is itself very heavy. The weight can be imagined from the weight of a car battery which consists of lead plates. Another concern was about the disposal of nuclear wastes once it is utilized. And the most important concern was about the access of uranium to general public. if not an atomic bomb a small amount of it can make other powerful bomb.

Designers anticipated that the would be able to travel about 5,000 miles per charge. For service stations they had the idea of centres where they could swap the old reactor wwith a new one. 

 

During that time America had just won the war due to atomic weaponry and people were eager to adopt nuclear powered cars. Unlike today, most people didn’t understand the hazards of nuclear power, and every minor accident could become a nuclear disaster. Due to these reasons the Nucleon concept did generate excitement. Some even say that the U.S. government backed this project.

The engineers at Ford imagined that this sleek and futuristic car was going to be a hit with the american public. They imagined that the internal combustion engine would die and be replaced by a nuclear engine. But the idea rested on light nuclear power plant with lighter shielding materials. These innovations failed to appear (even today) and the project was dumped due to its impracticality.

The designers sure deserve a pat for their ingenuity and vision.

Related Posts:

  • Uncle B

    Radical, yes, outlandish, of course, but with that American hallmark, bigger, much bigger than ever required! In the new “Post-Materialist” Meritocracy that will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes of the likes of Detroit City, and at the end of the current, advertisement defined “American Dream”, a sustainability factor, a modesty factor and a practicality factor will be calculated into any design projections, and a new ‘end of cheap oil’ reality will set in. An unrelenting China factor will be counted as valid and an Asian overall factor may decide the greatness of our individual and collective greatness as a nation. America, we are about to get our fingernails trimmed, very close, possibly to the quick, by the facts of life, like it or not!

  • CletusShirley

    This is the next step for automotive SEM, nuclear energy powered cars. Fossil fuels will end soon or will become too expensive and alternatives will have to appear. Nuclear energy is surely one of them although I'd rather they'd research more about environmentally friendly energy sources.

  • coco1212

    Love its futuristic design, I'd totally drive one if given the opportunity.

  • risi13

    The Ford Nucleon concept is admirable, but I don't understand one aspect: you said that “It would have been one of the most environment friendly cars ” how is that possible since we're all aware of the hazards of nuclear waste. I saw another amazing car concept at Ford Iowa, it was a car running on a hybrid engine that used 50% water and 50% regular gas.

  • rising_moon

    I feel the same as risi13, it doesn’t really sounds safe. I believe that there are other sources of energy, and I too have seen a beautiful electric nissan Philadelphia model, so if we have these options why risk with something that could be dangerous?

  • Marshallhayek

    A nuclear car seems to be a little unsafe for the general population. One small accident could prove to be a disaster for all the people living in the near ares of such an accident. We have a car that runs on water, but because of the oil companies, that car is still just on paper.
    _______________________________
    Ford dealers NH

  • your rad man

    lol a suicide bomber would love to get ahold of this

  • WTFH is wrong with u guy

    f this i could be died if a dumb bitch ran into me and half the city wth

  • http://security-wire.com/02/how-to-remove-internet-defender-rogue-anti-spyware.html remove Internet Defender virus

    I think it's ugly:(

  • Jesse162

    i think that this would be a good idea if it puts off as much energy as you say it does then hauling around the extra weight of sheilding should be no problem so it might not make a good car but a truck or eighteen wheeler might be a different story as to preventing accidents i think this technology should be put in with the fully automous cars

  • CeltsMan97

    If Ford could have made the car safer and found a way to keep it from destroying if it got in an accident it would have been practical. Scientists today might be able to achieve this today, but I’m not sure. It would be great because 1 pound of enriched Uranium is equal to 1 million gallons of gasoline. This could save us from using up fossil fuel resources although enriched uranium (Uranium 235) is extremely hard to get from Uranium 238 since their isotopes are the same. 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: