<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Antivirus Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/</link>
	<description>For All Your Nerdy Bytes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:52:19 +0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Strange User</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5743</link>
		<dc:creator>Strange User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdmodo.com/?p=15#comment-5743</guid>
		<description>My best AV SOLUTION is this.  I do all my browsing and downloading (like now) in a Linux VM running ClamAV and Bitdefender.  Both are free on Linux.   If the files are clean, I move them over to the XP Pro Host, which is running Symantec Endpoint Protection.  I really think the best defense is to work inside an environment that can&#039;t be infected easily and use a good scanner before introducing windows to that amazing file you downloaded.  (-;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Realtime protection in Linux isn&#039;t really a worry, but once you put that file in the windows environment, it is.&lt;br&gt;I have noticed that ClamAV and bitdefender draw different distinctions between malware and &quot;just a nuisance&quot;.&lt;br&gt;Symantic seems to ignore some adware if its prolific, removing would break your cool program and its not a real threat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bitdefender and ClamAV, on the other hand just don&#039;tcare.  They will both give you the option to remove most anything.  Hope you know what you are doing!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At any rate, the &quot;bad&quot; things, like really bad get detected and removed by all three.  Experience has taught me though, use a windows system long enough on the web and a smart virus will break any AV then break your system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My best AV SOLUTION is this.  I do all my browsing and downloading (like now) in a Linux VM running ClamAV and Bitdefender.  Both are free on Linux.   If the files are clean, I move them over to the XP Pro Host, which is running Symantec Endpoint Protection.  I really think the best defense is to work inside an environment that can&#39;t be infected easily and use a good scanner before introducing windows to that amazing file you downloaded.  (-;  </p>
<p>Realtime protection in Linux isn&#39;t really a worry, but once you put that file in the windows environment, it is.<br />I have noticed that ClamAV and bitdefender draw different distinctions between malware and &#8220;just a nuisance&#8221;.<br />Symantic seems to ignore some adware if its prolific, removing would break your cool program and its not a real threat.</p>
<p>Bitdefender and ClamAV, on the other hand just don&#39;tcare.  They will both give you the option to remove most anything.  Hope you know what you are doing!</p>
<p>At any rate, the &#8220;bad&#8221; things, like really bad get detected and removed by all three.  Experience has taught me though, use a windows system long enough on the web and a smart virus will break any AV then break your system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free antivirus detection rates &#124; Hi Tech Stuff Reviews &#38; Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5665</link>
		<dc:creator>Free antivirus detection rates &#124; Hi Tech Stuff Reviews &#38; Updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdmodo.com/?p=15#comment-5665</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 10 Antivirus Software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 Antivirus Software [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curmudgeonly Ad Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5417</link>
		<dc:creator>Curmudgeonly Ad Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdmodo.com/?p=15#comment-5417</guid>
		<description>Ok, my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sophos.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;antivirus&lt;/a&gt; is not even on the honorable mention list, which makes me assume it was not even tested...which makes me wonder why it wasn&#039;t tested..Please give Sophos a look the next time you run one of these comparisons...I would love to see how it stacks up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, my <a href="http://www.sophos.com" rel="nofollow">antivirus</a> is not even on the honorable mention list, which makes me assume it was not even tested&#8230;which makes me wonder why it wasn&#39;t tested..Please give Sophos a look the next time you run one of these comparisons&#8230;I would love to see how it stacks up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashwinram472</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5141</link>
		<dc:creator>ashwinram472</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdmodo.com/?p=15#comment-5141</guid>
		<description>nod32 is a waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nod32 is a waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuNetizen</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5078</link>
		<dc:creator>NuNetizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdmodo.com/?p=15#comment-5078</guid>
		<description>Had very bad experiences with BitDefender 2009. Worst product on this list. Can&#039;t imagine how it can make any Top 10 list. I suffered numerous re-intallations of this product because it was unstable and buggy (and would stop working for no reason). If you do a few searches on the net, you&#039;ll see what I mean. Kaspersky is very good, very stable, and does the job. Avast is a good free alternative. I&#039;m currently using VIPRE, which looks quite good. I really like the user interface, and it looks like a really good product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had very bad experiences with BitDefender 2009. Worst product on this list. Can&#39;t imagine how it can make any Top 10 list. I suffered numerous re-intallations of this product because it was unstable and buggy (and would stop working for no reason). If you do a few searches on the net, you&#39;ll see what I mean. Kaspersky is very good, very stable, and does the job. Avast is a good free alternative. I&#39;m currently using VIPRE, which looks quite good. I really like the user interface, and it looks like a really good product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdmodo.com/2009/04/top-10-antivirus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdmodo.com/?p=15#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>NOD 32 is the only antivirus that deletes all viruses,worms and trojans when compared to kaspersky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOD 32 is the only antivirus that deletes all viruses,worms and trojans when compared to kaspersky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
